Analyzing the relationship between language and mystical experience from a constructivism perspective Case study: The image of the “bride” in the works of Ruzbihan Baqli

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Faculty member of Persian language and literature department of Shiraz University

Abstract

One of the main images in Ruzbihan's works, especially in his two main books, namely Abhar al-Asheqin, and the Sharh-e Shathiaat is the image of the "bride". On the other hand, Ruzbihan, in his revelations that he reports in the book Kashf al-Asrar, frequently sees God, the prophets and the angels, and himself in the face of the bride. This article tries to explain the connection between these two phenomena, i.e. the frequent existence of the image of the bride in the language of Ruzbihan in his theoretical books on the one hand and the seeing of the bride in his mystical experiences on the other hand based on the theory of constructivism. The theory of constructivism in mystical studies expresses the idea that the mystical experiences of a mystic are formulated by his mind and language, and no mystical experience is made independently of the mystic's previous mental and linguistic models and patterns. The mystic, therefore, experiences in his mystical experiences what has already been placed in the realm of his mind and his language. From this perspective, it can be said that knowing the key metaphors and images of the language of a mystic is the key to understanding why he experiences such revelations.

Keywords


Arberry, Arthur. (1986). Shiraz; Persian city of saints and poets. (M. Kashif, Trans), fifth edition, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company.
Barcelona, ​​Antonio. (2011). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. (F. Sojudi and others, Trans) Tehran: Naqsh-e Jahan.
Ernst, Carl. (1998. ( Ruzbihan Baqli: Mysticism and the Rhetoric of Sainthood in Persian Sufism. (M. Kivani, Trans) Tehran: Nashr-e markaz.
Fanning, Steven. (2010). Mystics of the Christian Tradition. (F. Radmehr, Trans) Tehran: Nilufar.
Forman, Robert (2004). Mysticism, mind, consciousness. (A. Anzali), Trans, Qom: Mofid University.
Fotouhi, Mahmoud and Homa Rahmani. (2015). "The Function of Metaphor in Expressing the Mystical Experiences of Ruzbihan Baqli in Abhar al-Asheqin". Mysticism Research Journal, 9th year, pp. 137-164.
Fotouhi, Mahmoud and Maryam Alinejad. (2009). "Investigating the relationship between mystical experience and visual language in Abhar al-Asheqin". Literature study, No. 10. pp. 10-25.
Ghaemi nia, Alireza. (2002). Religious experience and the essence of religion. Qom: Bostan Kitab.
Hashemi, Zohre. (2010). "Conceptual metaphor theory from the perspective of Lakoff and Johnson". Literature study, summer. The twelfth number. pp. 119-140.
Hick, John. (2003). The fifth dimension (exploring the spiritual realm). (B. Saleki, Trans) Tehran: Qaseide Sora.
Izutsu, Toshihiko. (2004). Creation and the timeless order of things. (M. Sar reshtedari, Trans). Tehran: Mehrandish.
Katz, Steven. (2004). Constructivism, tradition and mysticism. (A. Anzali, Trans) Qom: Ayat-e Eshgh.
Lakoff, George and others (2012). Metaphor as the basis of thinking and a tool for creating beauty. (F. Sasani and others, Trans). 2nd  edition. Tehran: Sure-ye Mehr.
Malekian, Mustafa. (2007). A series of topics on comparative mysticism. Qom: University of Religion.
Ruzbihan, Abu Mohammad. (1987). Abhar al-Asheqin. (H. Corbin and M. Moein Edit), Tehran: Manochehri.
Ruzbihan, Abu Mohammad. (2010). Abhar al-Asheqin . (S. J. Nourbakhsh, Edit), Tehran: Yalda Qalam.
Ruzbihan, Abu Mohammad. (2010). Sharh-e Shathyat. (H. Corbin, Edit), Tehran: Tahuri.
Ruzbihan, Abu Mohammad. (2014). Kash al-Asrar. (M. Hosini, Trans). Tehran: Sokhan.
Shafi'i Kodkani, Mohammad Reza. (2012). Poetry language in Sufi prose. Tehran: Sokhan.
Shirvani, Ali. (2009). Theoretical foundations of religious experience: applied and critical study of the views of Ibn Arabi and Rudolph Otto, Qom: Bostan Kitab.
 
 
 
References [In English]:
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. (2003). Metaphors we live by. London: The university of Chicago press.