Ambiguity-arising Brevities in the Prose of Bidel's Chahar 'Unsor (Four Elements)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Faculty Member of Persian Language and Literature Department of Qom University

2 PhD student of Persian Language and Literature, Qom University.

Abstract

The famous Indian poet Biddle Dehlavi, in addition to poetry, also has prose works. Biddle's prose is as difficult as his poetry. One of the complexities lies in his promising and ambiguous language in prose. While in prose, because of the weight and rhyme release, there should be less artistic ambiguity, but this is not the case. An important factor in these ambiguities is the grammatical form of combinations and sentences that are associated with deletion. The deletions that have been made in grammatical terms and intonation in four parts have led to the termination of meaning and the repetition of sentences and the blending of these with other expressive tools has added to the ambiguity of the text. The purpose of this paper is to study the factors of ambiguity based on grammatical norms and the discovery of infrastructure sentences, with the help of expressive and innovative elements. We have analyzed anecdotally, expressively and grammatically, for precise examination, vague sentences and combinations based on need and for the meaning of the meaning, we have provided some grammatical patterns. Bidel's interest in knitting, combining with infusion, the development of the present meaning, Creating the relationship of this one in some combinations and removing the grammatical elements associated with the confusion of imagination, along with his lack of full control over the rules of the Persian language, he has been ambiguous in the four elements of prose.

Keywords

References

References [in Persian]:
Bahar, Mohammad Taqi. (1992). Stylistics. Volume 3. Sixth Edition. Tehran: Amirkabir Publications.
Bidel Dehlavi, Abu al-Ma'ani Abdul Qadir. (1964). Chahar Unsor (Chahar Onsor). Volumes 1 and 4. Kabul, Publisher: Department of Ministry and Department of Administration.
 Hosseini, Seyed Hassan (1990). Biddle, Sepehri and Indian style. Tehran: Soroush.
Khalili, Khalilullah and Effat e Mostasharniya. (2008). Faiz Quds. Tehran: Afghan Shariati.
Zarrinkoob, Abdul Hussein. (1994). With Hilla caravan. Seventh edition. Tehran: Scientific.
Saljuk, Salahuddin. (2002). Criticism of Biddle. Second Edition, Tehran: Erfan.
Shafiee Kadkani, Mohammad Reza. (2001). The Poet of Mirrors, Fifth Edition. Tehran: Agah.
Shamisa, Siros. (2012). Stylistics of Persian prose. Tehran: Mitra.
Safa, Zabihullah. (1992). History of Literature in Iran. Volume 5. Tehran: Ferdows.
UmarMah Jabin. (2009). Biddle specific compounds in Chahar Unsor. New Delhi: Persian Cultural Center of Iranian Cultural Counseling in New Delhi.  
Kardgar, Yahya. (2018). Written waiting. Tehran: Contemporary Voice.
Valipour, Abdullah, Hemmati, Roghayeh. (2012). " Transitory in the flower garden of the Chahar Unsor of Biddle Dehlavi". Journal of Subcontinental Studies. forth year. Issue thirteen. Pp. 115-140.
Valipour, Abdullah and Hemmati, Roghayeh. (2016). "Distortion, correction and misreading in the Chahar Unsor of Biddle Dehlavi". Heritage Mirror Magazine. No. 59. pp. 215-236.
Walipur, Abdullah. (2015). "Transistori in the valley of the meanings of Ghazal, introduction of the Chahar Unsor of Biddle Dehlavi". Mirror of Heritage. Appendix No. 36. pp. 229-266.
Humayi, Jalaluddin. (2011). Rhetoric and literary crafts. Tehran: Ahura.
Journal of Prose Studies in Persian Literature
Volume 23, Issue 48
December 2021
Pages 199-220

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics