Comparison Of Letterʼs Structure In Meibody And Tafreshi Composition

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Urmia University, literature faculty

2 Persian Literature Department, Humanity Faculty, Urmia University, Iran

3 Persian Literature Department, Humanity Faculty, Urmia University,Urmia, Iran

Abstract

Composition is one of the old kinds in Persian literature which has determined structure that it wrote in three sections. In Safavi and Teimouri dynasty current sample prose and some of authors have not enough science, then this determine structure to be omitted. For ther more, some of authors try to write his letter base on previous period. As it is seen, the composition of this period divided to two sections. one of it has new method and another has old method . This paper investigates letters structure in Meibody book and Tafreshi book. Result research show that Meibody is following at previous method. He uses at Arabic and Farsi prayer in beginning of his letter and he wish that his addressing has longevity. He uses at simple and compound adjective is another manner at Meibody to create a letter similar to old book. We can say Meibody is one of the last authors that write his letter base on three sections. Tafreshi tries to write letters in new method. In fact in his letter we can not see limits betwixt beginning, text and end of letters. He omit simple and compound adjective in his letter, and tries to create a text which it is different with another books

Keywords

References

References [in Arabic]:
 Qurʼan. (2005). Trans M. E. Qomsheie. Qom: Alhadi press.
 
References [in Persian]:
Baqdadi, M. (2006). Al Tavasol Ea Tarasol, Edited by A. Bahmanyar. Tehran: Asatir press.
Dorpar, M. and Qavam. A. and Fotouhi, M. and Hashemi, M. (2012). "Stylist and classification in Persian litter". journal of expert in stylist in poem and pros. 5 (1), 47 – 66.
Fayaz, A. (2010). "Knowege of Meibodi in historical". journal in Isfahan university. 2 (3). 93- 115.
Gavan, E. (2001). Manazer Al Ensha, Eited by M. Madankan. Tehran: Academy of language and literature.
Jahadi, S. A. (2014). "Tarasol in Teimory era". Kohan name of Persian literature, 5 (2), 75 – 98.
Khatibi, H. (2007). Prose in Persian literature. Tehran: Zavar press.
Khaqani, A. (2005). Composition. Eited by M. Rowshan. Tehran: University of Tehran press.
Meibody, HH. (1997). Composition. Edited by N. Forouhar. Tehran: Noqte press.
Mihani, M. (2010). Ceremony of secretary (clerk). Edited by A. Nahvi. Tehran: University press.
Safa, Z. (2001). A History of Persian literature, part one. Tehtan: Qoqnous press.
Shamisa, S. (1997). Stylistics. Tehran: Mitra press.
Soleimani (2009). Composition. Edited by Jafaryan. Tehran: Library and museum in Iranian Mjlis press.
Tafreshi, M. H. (2011). Composition. Research and Edited by M. Bahram Nezhad. Tehran: Library and museum in Iranian Mjlis press.
Vahed, A. (1999). "Composition Persian from past to six sentury". Tabriz university journal. 121 – 166.
Vatvat, R. (2004). Letters of Vatvat. Edited by Q. Tuiserkani. Tehran: University of Tehran press.    
Journal of Prose Studies in Persian Literature
Volume 23, Issue 47
June 2020
Pages 217-240

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics