The comparison of Nezam al-Mulk ministerial point of view and the point of view of authorship Beyhaqi about the importance of judgment place in political government on the basis of Critical Discourse Analysis

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of hakim sabzevari univercity

2 PhD Candidate in Persian Language and Literature, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran

Abstract

One of the most essential duties of any government is vanishing hostility and removal of the factor of quarrel among individuals of civil society and achievement of social justice, the courts of administration of justice, independent Supreme Court, tribunal court and attendance of purified and fair judges will be possible. All the scientists know that the existence of equality and fair any time and in any place is essential. Two anecdotes with the same topics have been chosen one from Siasat Nameh book and the other from Beyhaqi History book in this research and for Discourse Analysis their the policy manner method of Norman Fairclough is used as the main theoretician. Critical Discourse Analysis and on the basis of triplet models of N. Fairclough, it is described, exegesis and specified the two exam plums with considering the whole two books as the between the lines to analyze and specify the opposition of ministerial point of view of Nezam al-Mulk and authorship point of view of Beyhaqi about the important subject of judgment. Khajeh considering his political rank , always believe that judgment belongs to the mighty class, the authority that consciously or unconsciously has disguised its own point of view in between the lines of language in which powerless people has no right. , Beyhaqi as a historian and authorship from the middle class of society with all dependence to Qaznavian government tries shows the position of public people, weak and oppressed people in between the lines of his speeches.

Keywords

References

References [in Persian]:
Agha Gol zadeh, F. (2006). Critical Discourse Analysis, Tehran: Elmi & Farhangi Press.
Beyhaqi, A.(1994). Beyhaqi History, by the endeavors: khal-e khatib-rahbar, Fourth Edition, Tehran: Mahtab Press.
Fairclough, N. (2000). Critical Discourse Analysis, (F. Shayeste Piran & …., Trans.).Tehran: Center for Media Studies and Research Press.   
Fairclough, N. (2019). Critical Discourse Analysis, (R. Ghasemi Trans.).Tehran: Andishe-ye Ehsan Press.
Jafari, M. (2011) The structure of the ministry in the covenant Ghaznavi  is based on Beyhaqi History, (MA of Persian  Language and Literature studies), Zahra Ekhtiyari, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad. Nakhjavani, H. (1976). Tajareb-os Salaf, (Edited by A. Eghbal). Tehran: Tahori Press.
Qajari, H. A., & Nazari, J. (2013). Application of Discourse Analysis in Social Research, Tehran: Jameeshenasan Press.
Sojoudi, F. & Akbari, Z. (2014). "A Critical Analysis Discourse of the Maqamat-e Mashayekh-e Soufiye". Journal of Archeology of Persian Literature. 4 (73-97).
Tajik, M. R. (2000). Discourse and Discourse Analysis, Tehran: Farang-e Gofteman Press.
Tousi, N. (1976).Siyar-ol-Molouk, (Edited by H. Dark).Tehran: Book Press.
Tousi, N. (1985).Siyar-ol-Molouk, (Edited by H. Dark). Second Edition,  Tehran: Elmi & Farhangi Press.
Tousi, N. (1992). Siyasat-Name, (corrected by J. Shear). Tehran: Ketabhaye Jibi press.
Yar Mohami, L. (2004). Common and Critical Discourse, Tehran: Hermes Press.
Yar Mohami, L. (2006). Communications  from the perspective of Critical Discourse, Tehran: Hermes Press.
Uonesi, E.(2017).The art ofwriting stories, Tehran: Negah Press.
Uosefi, Gh. H. (1991). Didari Ba Ahle Ghalam, Tehran: Elmi Press.
Yorgensen, M., & Philips, L. (2010). Discourse Analysis as theory and method, (H. Jalili, Trans.). Tehran: Ney Press.
Journal of Prose Studies in Persian Literature
Volume 23, Issue 47
June 2020
Pages 191-216

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics